By Nazila Ghanea, Alan Stephens, Raphael Walden
The place can religions locate resources of legitimacy for human rights? How do, and the way may still, spiritual leaders and groups reply to human rights as outlined in sleek foreign legislations? while spiritual precepts contradict human rights criteria - for instance on the subject of freedom of expression or with regards to punishments - which should still trump the opposite, and why? Can human rights and spiritual teachings be interpreted in a fashion which brings reconciliation nearer? Do the fashionable idea and method of human rights undermine the very imaginative and prescient of society that religions target to impart? Is a connection with God within the dialogue of human rights lost? Do human fallibilities with appreciate to interpretation, judicial reasoning and the certainty of human oneness and dignity give you the key to the indisputable and occasionally devastating conflicts that experience arisen among religions and the human rights flow? during this quantity, lecturers and legal professionals take on those such a lot tricky questions head-on, with candour and creativity, and the gathering is rendered distinctive via the additional contributions of a notable diversity of alternative execs, together with senior non secular leaders and representatives, reporters, diplomats and civil servants, either nationwide and overseas. such a lot particularly, the participants don't turn away from the boldest query of all - summed up within the book's identify. The completely edited and revised papers which make up this assortment have been initially ready for a ground-breaking convention organised by means of the Clemens Nathan study Centre, the collage of London Institute of Commonwealth stories and Martinus Nijhoff/Brill educational Publishers in London in February 2005.
Read or Download Does God Believe in Human Rights? PDF
Best human rights books
Are civil conflicts and coups d'etat concerns of overseas main issue, or questions of nationwide curiosity merely? How can the more and more universal perform of condemnation and intervention via the United international locations and person States into events of maximum political violence be understood? Will civil clash at some point be thought of unlawful less than overseas legislations, within the comparable means as overseas struggle?
In an age of globalization, loose exchange could be synonymous with prosperity for all. but too frequently, small farmers, indigenous peoples, individuals with HIV, and others are disregarded of the image. This ebook proposes a brand new technique to make loose alternate paintings for everyone. It examines how alternate pacts can gain humans, yet may also threaten their uncomplicated human rights to entry nutrients, medications, and schooling, or to guard their cultural history.
The belief of cultural historical past as an 'international public solid' could be traced again to the Preamble of the 1954 Hague conference for the safety of Cultural estate within the occasion of Armed clash, in response to which "damage to cultural estate belonging to any humans whatever capability harm to the cultural historical past of all mankind".
During this daring ebook, A. Naomi Paik grapples with the background of U. S. legal camps that experience restrained humans outdoor the bounds of felony and civil rights. faraway from the social and political groups that will warrantly primary felony protections, those detainees are successfully rightless, stripped of the best even to have rights.
- Access to Justice as a Human Right (Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law)
- The limits of humanitarian intervention: genocide in Rwanda
- The Handbook of Reparations
- Do It Yourself A Handbook for Changing Our World
- The European Human Rights Culture: A Paradox of Human Rights Protection in Europe?
- The End of Human Rights
Extra info for Does God Believe in Human Rights?
Why should they be denied the opportunity to do so? The answer is the need for States to order their aﬀairs in the interests of all within their jurisdiction, rather than in accordance with the views of some, be they majority or minority. Tolerance, respect and pluralism are diﬃcult values to cross swords with. Yet these values are not neutral: they carry with them a very real set of assumptions concerning the legitimate reach of religion in the public sphere. Even advancing these claims of human rights through the instru-the Universality Debate’, in R.
Nevertheless, the image of God doctrine that the biblical religions share delivers a belief in basic equality that 4 I have explored this topic in Human Rights and the Image of God (London, scm Press, 2004). 5 As, of course, does rabbinic theology – see below. Whatever religion is professed, wealth, class, skin-colour, lineage, gender and other contingent diﬀerences are used to discriminate between persons and put them in hierarchies of dignity and worth. The doctrine of God’s image born by every human being has been, and remains in some respects, severely counter-cultural.
I think one of the areas in which this has happened over the last twenty or thirty years has been the realisation that human rights are not just negative rights. They are not just about stopping people being tortured, or imprisoned without trial and so on. There are also posi-tive rights, and these are enshrined in the UN Declaration on Human Rights as well as the European Convention. People have a basic right to a particular minimum standard of living, to healthcare and so on. Within Christian theology over the last two or three decades this has been a particular emphasis, especially with those Christian theologians regard-ing themselves as ‘liberation theologians’.