By Adrian Johnston
Slavoj Žižek is without doubt one of the finest and demanding philosophers operating this day, identified mainly for his theoretical explorations of pop culture and modern politics. This ebook specializes in the commonly ignored and sometimes overshadowed philosophical middle of Žižek’s work—an crucial part in any real appreciation of this certain thinker’s accomplishment.
His valuable situation, Žižek has proclaimed, is to take advantage of psychoanalysis (especially the lessons of Jacques Lacan) to redeploy the insights of late-modern German philosophy, specifically, the concept of Kant, Schelling, and Hegel. by means of taking this avowal heavily, Adrian Johnston eventually clarifies the philosophical undertaking underlying Žižek’s efforts. His e-book charts the interlinked ontology and thought of subjectivity developed by way of Žižek on the intersection of German idealism and Lacanian idea. Johnston additionally makes use of Žižek’s mixture of philosophy and psychoanalysis to deal with perennial philosophical difficulties: the connection of brain and physique, and the character of human freedom. by way of bringing jointly the earlier centuries of ecu philosophy, psychoanalytic metapsychology, and state-of-the-art paintings within the typical sciences, Johnston develops a transcendental materialist conception of subjectivity—in brief, an account of ways more-than-material kinds of subjectivity can emerge from a corporeal being. His paintings indicates how an engagement with Žižek’s philosophy can produce compelling solutions to today’s such a lot vexing and pressing questions as inherited from the heritage of ideas.
“It is often tough to learn books approximately oneself; with Johnston’s ebook, my anxiousness used to be even superior than ordinary. whereas analyzing it, I usually had the uncanny feeling of being faced by means of a line of argumentation which inserts greater than my very own texts what i'm suffering to formulate—as if he's the unique and i'm a duplicate. He definitely is familiar with find out how to learn me. the vast majority of my critics be aware of pop culture, politics, and beliefs in my work—Johnston is going on to its transcendental-ontological nucleus. this isn't a e-book on me, yet a e-book, serious of me, on what either Johnston and that i examine the middle of our philosophical hindrance. I hence recommend the reader to ignore me and to benefit from the labor of penetrating the vague size of the philosophical foundations of psychoanalysis.” —Slavoj Žižek
Read Online or Download Žižek’s Ontology: A Transcendental Materialist Theory of Subjectivity PDF
Best psychoanalysis books
Jeanine Herman (tr. )
Julia Kristeva refracts the impulse to hate (and our makes an attempt to subvert, sublimate, and in a different way technique it) via psychoanalysis and textual content, exploring worlds, girls, faith, pix, and the act of writing. Her inquiry spans topics, subject matters, and figures primary to her writing, and her paths of discovery improve the theoretical ideas which are so attribute of her thought.
Kristeva rearticulates and extends her research of language, abjection, idealization, girl sexuality, love, and forgiveness. She examines the "maladies of the soul," using examples from her perform and the diseases of her sufferers, equivalent to fatigue, irritability, and common malaise. She resources the Bible and texts through Marguerite Duras, St. Teresa of Avila, Roland Barthes, Simone de Beauvoir, and Georgia O'Keefe. Balancing political calamity and person pathology, she addresses inner and exterior catastrophes and worldwide and private accidents, confronting the character of melancholy, obliviousness, worry, and the pain of being and nothingness.
Throughout Kristeva develops the idea that psychoanalysis is the main to serenity, with its techniques of turning again, on reflection, investigating the self, and refashioning psychical harm into whatever necessary and lovely. consistent wondering, Kristeva contends, is key to attaining the arriving to phrases all of us search on the middle of forgiveness.
Le Moi et le Ca, paru en 1923, est l. a. clé de voûte de ce qu'on appelle los angeles "seconde topique" chez Freud. A l'empilement pyramidal de l'inconscient, du pré-conscient et du conscient (première "topique" de l. a. psychanalyse) succède une notion du système psychique plus fluide, interactive et dialectique, dans laquelle le Moi s'avère très lié à l'inconscient, lequel ne coïncide plus avec le refoulé.
Has Jacques Lacan's influence on psychoanalysis quite been assessed? His formula that the Freudian subconscious is "structured like a language" is recognized, yet this used to be basically the start. there has been then the extensively new thesis of the "real unconscious". Why this step? looking for the Ariadne's thread that runs all through Lacan's ever-evolving educating, this ebook illuminates the questions implicit in each one step, and sheds new mild on his revisions and renewals of psychoanalytic innovations.
Considering trauma is a completely relational phenomenon, it's hugely unpredictable, and can't be made to slot in the clinical framework Freud so renowned. In towards a Psychology of Uncertainty: Trauma-Centered Psychoanalysis, Doris Brothers urges a go back to a trauma-centered psychoanalysis. applying relational platforms concept, she exhibits that reports of uncertainty are continuously remodeled by means of the regulatory procedures of way of life reminiscent of feeling, understanding, forming different types, making judgements, utilizing language, growing narratives, sensing time, remembering, forgetting, and fantasizing.
- How Money Talks
- The Formation of the Scientific Mind: A Contribution to a Psychoanalysis of Objective Knowledge (Clinamen Series on Philosophy of Science)
- Passion in theory : conceptions of Freud and Lacan
- Cultural Zoo: Animals in the Human Mind and its Sublimations
- Memory, Mourning, Landscape (At the Interface/Probing the Boundaries, Volume 71)
- Endless Night: Cinema and Psychoanalysis, Parallel Histories
Extra resources for Žižek’s Ontology: A Transcendental Materialist Theory of Subjectivity
Speaking of the Hegelian "night of the world," Zizek claims that death itself stands for this "self-withdrawal, the absolute contraction of subjectivity, the severing of its links with Reality'" (Zizek 1999b, 154). What if the inverse is (also) true? 6 Is the subject-asnegativity a response to its corporeal Grund (ground), to a primordially chaotic and discordant Real that produces its own negation immanently out of itself? Are Zizek's otherwise inexplicably odd choices of adjectives here indicative of such a link, of a thinly concealed umbilical cord teth ering the (pseudo)immateriality of the modern subject to a dark base rendered obscure through a forceful disavowal/abjection?
Kant's status as a pivotal linchpin in the history of philosophy is a central tenet of Zizek's oeuvre. , the distinction between the "I" as an unknowable an sick kernel and the "I" as it appears to itself vis-a-vis various series of appearances and their qualities) and Lacan's separa tion of the sujet from the moi What's more, in numerous places, Zizek argues that Lacan is deeply Kantian: Lacan, in contrast to his theoretical contemporaries, pursues a transcendental project involving a "critique of pure desire";9 both the Kantian and Lacanian subjects are "empty," incapable of being collapsed back into the determinate empiricalphenomenal contents fleshing out this $ as a monstrous, faceless void;10 the Lacanian distinction between the subjects of enunciation and utter ance is ultimately a Kantian one;11 Lacan's subject of the unconscious is nothing other than what Kant designates as the necessary failure of intro spective reflection to establish any kind of stable, qualitative self-identity12 .
Its ownmost ontological finitude, arising from the brute Real as both temporality and corporeal ity—there are justifications for viewing time itself, in its resdess nega tivity, as belonging to the dimension of the Real in Lacanian theory43 (see chapter 15)—can be encountered only as an antinomic deadlock. Consequendy, such finitude also must be considered a noumenal, an sich feature of "this / o r he or it (the thing) . . " The subject is inherently barred from any form of phenomenal self-acquaintance in which it would know itself as finite in the ontological-material sense.